|
|
International legal protection of the safety of civil aviation
Štěpánková, Mirka ; Ondřej, Jan (advisor) ; Balaš, Vladimír (referee)
International Protection of Civil Aviation Safety. This analysis is based on the idea that the obligation of states to protect civil aviation against acts of unlawful interference, especially terrorist attacks, has certain limits. These limits find its source in international treaties. States are not only subjects of treaties, which protect civil aviation, but also subjects of treaties, which protect individuals and there human rights. Both kind of obligation should be respected. These days we can see, that states do not respect obligations and principles set by international human rights treaties and justify their invasive interference with human rights by stating that they are fighting against terrorism. Its mostly visible by interference with the human dignity, right to privacy, data protection. But there are also other right which can be affected - for example right to free movement or health protection. In my paper I try to analyse impacts of some measures adopted by states on human rightst and show that they sometimes do not respect requirements, which are set for limitations of these rights. The most important documents I am working with are the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the European Treaty on Human Rights. At the end of my paper I m concerning with a question, if it is...
|
|
|
International legal protection of the safety of civil aviation
Štěpánková, Mirka ; Ondřej, Jan (advisor) ; Balaš, Vladimír (referee)
International Protection of Civil Aviation Safety. This analysis is based on the idea that the obligation of states to protect civil aviation against acts of unlawful interference, especially terrorist attacks, has certain limits. These limits find its source in international treaties. States are not only subjects of treaties, which protect civil aviation, but also subjects of treaties, which protect individuals and there human rights. Both kind of obligation should be respected. These days we can see, that states do not respect obligations and principles set by international human rights treaties and justify their invasive interference with human rights by stating that they are fighting against terrorism. Its mostly visible by interference with the human dignity, right to privacy, data protection. But there are also other right which can be affected - for example right to free movement or health protection. In my paper I try to analyse impacts of some measures adopted by states on human rightst and show that they sometimes do not respect requirements, which are set for limitations of these rights. The most important documents I am working with are the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the European Treaty on Human Rights. At the end of my paper I m concerning with a question, if it is...
|
guest ::
RSS feed.